The Devolution Series, along with my interviews and Devolution Power Hours can be found on my website: https://www.devolution.link/ You can find me on Truth Social: @patelpatriot Find me on Telegram here: https://t.me/patelpatriot Don’t forget to Subscribe to support my work!
John, this is the creation of a history book. Your curiosity was a gift from God. I can't imagine how you are able to create this presentation like you're presenting in court and whatever money you're making, I hope it's tons and tons, is deserved. You are definitely 4D level historian.
I feel there's a best seller coming to Amazon in the years ahead (i.e. Devolution by Patel Patriot). I watched American Media Periscope with you, Praying Medic and host Sean Morgan - it was fantastic! You have worked diligently on your devolution series while many followed Q posts that essentially pioneered great media podcast shows (e.g. X22 Report, AWK et al). When you put the two together, Q posts and Devolution, you have what I believe is absolute proof a plan was put in place. Q posts, it seems, started the social media ball rolling up patriots and innocent bystanders. Today, Rumble and others, have an abundance of podcasts and presenters representing the Awakening and informing others of the real truth as "We Are The News" (i.e. The Salty Dog deserves worthy honorable mention). I'll end this by saying the Cabal/Deep State is trapped and has started down the path of self-destruction, and our Maestro will know when to play the Trump card. Thank you for a great series!
Your series essentially concludes that some sort of devolved government is in effect. The question though is: to what end? It's not enough to say what your entire series documents: devolution has a lot of past actions to back up that it's real. You've done that. The real issue is what did it mean? Let's accept that we actually have no real president - Trump or byeden. OK. But if Trump isn't actually president because he devolved (quit) his job, then his "return" has very few options. The vast majority of the nation isn't steeped in the 2020 aftermath and fallout. They - normies - watched Trump "leave" on January 20, 2021. They watch him now refer to byeden's "administration". This matters greatly because Trump himself - by calling it a byeden "administration" - is sanctioning the legitimacy of "byeden" as president, de facto. So any Trump "return" has to solve the problem of these optics. He cannot publicly claim byeden's administration is in fact an "administration" while simultaneously claiming he was and is still president of the US, and simply walk back into his old job and pick it up as though business-as-usual is in place. Which brings us to the method: how is it Trump could return, if in fact he can return?
We do know courts - federal, state and municipal - have reversed fraudulent elections, or prevented fraudulent counts to continue once in progress. A Trump court case would do more to wake up the normies to follow it to its conclusion. Since Trump has claimed massive fraud took place - and has it cold in terms of proof - then he would most benefit from proving his case in court. That not only gives legitimacy if he proves his case, but makes the anatomy of the fraud open for public viewing once the case becomes a matter of record. Since the fraud occurred in multiple states, it's possible Trump could make a filing directly to the SCOTUS. He can only introduce evidence at the point of original jurisdiction. So only if the SC is that venue can Trump present evidence to them. It's unlikely for him to file in any lower federal court because the case and the appeals process would take much, much longer. Only a SCOTUS ruling on the matter will settle it for normies in final terms. The SC's term ends in June and will not reconvene until October. So that pathway is time limited if Trump plans to return this year. I'd argue he won't return this year simply because the current congressional make up ensures the Democrat-majority House will impeach him again, and this time around "Old Crow McConnell" will force his troops to side with every Senate Democrat and convict him. Such are the ups and downs of "separate but equal". Any Trump devolved COG applies only to the Executive branch. The only other return option is if the military has to become involved in essentially taking over the US - which is a lot more dangerous. Given that Durham is not only circling the HRC 2016 campaign, he's also got - by definition - the whole of the Obama administration in his crosshairs too, since it was HIS government that enabled the HRC campaign to do all the spying on Trump. And we aren't even at the notorious laptop yet. Who knows who and what is implicated on there? Food shortages looming. Inflation rising. Southern border invasion. Anything could prompt them. That said, if the military had to take over - there would be no more congress and no more courts. They would have to setup new elections for every state. That path carries a lot of risks.
Your series does however beg a host interesting questions, not the least of which is this one: if Trump spent years preparing for the steal via all these executive orders and whatever PEADs he set up to devolve - then why did he shove Pence out into the spotlight as the lone guy who could have stopped the need for all this preparation? Trump was pushing Pence publicly as someone who had the authority on January 6 to send back the dual slates of electors to those 5 states and ask them to return only one slate each to Congress. Trump lawyer Jenna Ellis actually said that out loud: this was the Trump legal team plan as to why they went to testify to each legislature. But the question is the same: why is Trump leaving Pence dangling at all, forcing him to defend his decision NOT to do what Trump's legal team asked him to do if Trump already had the devolvement in place? If devolution was years in the making - and your series is all about proving that - then it makes no sense to push Pence out onto the plank as they did. Unless......pushing him out there is exactly what Trump wanted to do: make Pence have to betray MAGA supporters. As far as Trump supporters go, the vast majority of them look at Pence as a traitor having certified the fraud (which is a delicate position for him if he knew the extent of the fraud and certified it anyway). Given Trump has now officially kicked Pence to the curb - publicly stating any Trump return will not include him - maybe it was yet another 5D chess move of Trump getting rid of him the most effective way he could have done. Pence has no future now in politics despite setting up his office for a 2024 POTUS run. GOP voters will look at him as someone who certified a fraudulent election. That would be in keeping with Trump's growing list of masterstrokes.
You seem to lack the capacity of the task it takes to gather evidence and prosecute it. That takes years unfortunately. It's possibly true that there are tribunals at the White House since we know the White House is not occupied and there is a very strange but firm temporary structure in the back yard as per aerial photos of today's White House, which is also fenced now.
After reading this reply to me, I can honestly say I have no idea what you are addressing in my post. I said nothing about trials, tribunals, or anything else. I mentioned Trump proving election fraud to the SCOTUS. He already has the evidence - at least he says he does. SCOTUS is a civil court, not a criminal court. They don't prosecute. The "fence" around the white house is a construction fence surrounding the fountain in front, as Nancy Drew's videos clearly indicate. So honestly, I have no clue what it is you think I don't grasp. My point was whatever is devolved - if it is - pertains only to the Executive branch.
It’s very clear that you lack reading comprehension and this blog is above your pay grade. The reason zero cases have been in front of any courts is because they are corrupt. The Scotus was kicked saying they lack standing which is pure insanity. The cabal is deep. You’re assuming things work like under normal circumstances.
First, genius, you're so stunningly wrong about "zero cases having been in front of any court" that it speaks loudly to who it is between us that has the far lower pay grade. A total of 87 cases made their way into the court system dealing with the fraud of the 2020 election. Of those 87, Trump & the GOP won 71% of those.
So before you go around insulting people about what they do and don't know, get your own cluelessness shored up first. It took me all of 10 seconds to find this link to prove you don't know what you're talking about. So sit down. Stay quiet. And let those of us who have a clue hash this out. If your opinion is asked for, someone will call on you. But I wouldn't hold my breath if I were you, given you demonstrate no grasp of anything that's , you know, factual.
Great! Where's the decertification due to the 87 cases? And if you knew this, then why are you asking stupid questions. You are so dim you couldn't comprehend what I was saying, only what you wish to scream. So sit this one out Nicky.
LOL! You were the one who was flat out wrong, and you don't even have the integrity to admit it. Now you wanna demand where this mysterious "decertification" is, based on court cases you were adamant never existed. You're proven wrong about "0" cases, and to avoid being called out as the know-nothing you are, you just move on to the next complaint: where is "decertification"?? Tell you what, outline the statutes in each state that show all of us in detail what this "decertification" process is, legislatively. Show us what statutes exist now for all these legislatures to produce this "decertification" you demand - Screaming High-Chair Queen that you are. Go ahead...we'll wait. In the meantime..
Given all you do is ankle-bite bitching via a varying laundry list of complaints that had nothing to do with anything I wrote about, you outed yourself: one of those buffoons who thinks their thimble-sized intellect constitutes "expertise". Like I said: sit down, shut up, and let those who actually know things sort this out. It's painfully obvious this is already way out of your league.
I just was listening to your rumble channel from Friday, i believe, with Patrick and Chris Paul.
Devolution Power Hour #250, and I am at 1:39:30 and you 3 are talking about spreading word to get your channel out there organically... I WILL WHOLEHEARTEDLY SPREAD THE WORD, BUT YOU M U S T UNMUTE ME FROM COMMENTING! I've tried every way possible to be unmuted, but to no avail. It has been probably a year, so I quit listening because it is NOT FUN nor EDUCATIONAL (and it makes me feel like I'm unwanted, even though I am a yearly subscriber to to Substack)
My handle is Susannahmca Susannahmca PLEASE get me out of prison! Thank you, Susannah from Texas
I don't know if this will get through to anyone but why is Susie Wiles, Trump's top 2024 campaign advisor a co-chair at Mercury LLC, owned by Omnicom Group, a supporter of the WEF and a MSM promoter? What is going on? Is she a fox in the hen-house? Look it up for yourselves!
I don't know if this will get through to anyone but why is Susie Wiles, Trump's top 2024 campaign advisor a co-chair at Mercury LLC, owned by Omnicom Group, a supporter of the WEF and a MSM promoter? What is going on? Is she a fox in the hen-house? Look it up for yourselves!
A Gratitude of thanks , to Donald J Trump and to those implementing Devolution
.. And as ALWAYS much love to those Patriots fighting for Constitutional Freedom 🇺🇸 wwg1wga
John,
Your work ties in seamlessly with Derek Johnson's work on government continuity and Military Code of Justice.
John, this is the creation of a history book. Your curiosity was a gift from God. I can't imagine how you are able to create this presentation like you're presenting in court and whatever money you're making, I hope it's tons and tons, is deserved. You are definitely 4D level historian.
I feel there's a best seller coming to Amazon in the years ahead (i.e. Devolution by Patel Patriot). I watched American Media Periscope with you, Praying Medic and host Sean Morgan - it was fantastic! You have worked diligently on your devolution series while many followed Q posts that essentially pioneered great media podcast shows (e.g. X22 Report, AWK et al). When you put the two together, Q posts and Devolution, you have what I believe is absolute proof a plan was put in place. Q posts, it seems, started the social media ball rolling up patriots and innocent bystanders. Today, Rumble and others, have an abundance of podcasts and presenters representing the Awakening and informing others of the real truth as "We Are The News" (i.e. The Salty Dog deserves worthy honorable mention). I'll end this by saying the Cabal/Deep State is trapped and has started down the path of self-destruction, and our Maestro will know when to play the Trump card. Thank you for a great series!
Your series essentially concludes that some sort of devolved government is in effect. The question though is: to what end? It's not enough to say what your entire series documents: devolution has a lot of past actions to back up that it's real. You've done that. The real issue is what did it mean? Let's accept that we actually have no real president - Trump or byeden. OK. But if Trump isn't actually president because he devolved (quit) his job, then his "return" has very few options. The vast majority of the nation isn't steeped in the 2020 aftermath and fallout. They - normies - watched Trump "leave" on January 20, 2021. They watch him now refer to byeden's "administration". This matters greatly because Trump himself - by calling it a byeden "administration" - is sanctioning the legitimacy of "byeden" as president, de facto. So any Trump "return" has to solve the problem of these optics. He cannot publicly claim byeden's administration is in fact an "administration" while simultaneously claiming he was and is still president of the US, and simply walk back into his old job and pick it up as though business-as-usual is in place. Which brings us to the method: how is it Trump could return, if in fact he can return?
We do know courts - federal, state and municipal - have reversed fraudulent elections, or prevented fraudulent counts to continue once in progress. A Trump court case would do more to wake up the normies to follow it to its conclusion. Since Trump has claimed massive fraud took place - and has it cold in terms of proof - then he would most benefit from proving his case in court. That not only gives legitimacy if he proves his case, but makes the anatomy of the fraud open for public viewing once the case becomes a matter of record. Since the fraud occurred in multiple states, it's possible Trump could make a filing directly to the SCOTUS. He can only introduce evidence at the point of original jurisdiction. So only if the SC is that venue can Trump present evidence to them. It's unlikely for him to file in any lower federal court because the case and the appeals process would take much, much longer. Only a SCOTUS ruling on the matter will settle it for normies in final terms. The SC's term ends in June and will not reconvene until October. So that pathway is time limited if Trump plans to return this year. I'd argue he won't return this year simply because the current congressional make up ensures the Democrat-majority House will impeach him again, and this time around "Old Crow McConnell" will force his troops to side with every Senate Democrat and convict him. Such are the ups and downs of "separate but equal". Any Trump devolved COG applies only to the Executive branch. The only other return option is if the military has to become involved in essentially taking over the US - which is a lot more dangerous. Given that Durham is not only circling the HRC 2016 campaign, he's also got - by definition - the whole of the Obama administration in his crosshairs too, since it was HIS government that enabled the HRC campaign to do all the spying on Trump. And we aren't even at the notorious laptop yet. Who knows who and what is implicated on there? Food shortages looming. Inflation rising. Southern border invasion. Anything could prompt them. That said, if the military had to take over - there would be no more congress and no more courts. They would have to setup new elections for every state. That path carries a lot of risks.
Your series does however beg a host interesting questions, not the least of which is this one: if Trump spent years preparing for the steal via all these executive orders and whatever PEADs he set up to devolve - then why did he shove Pence out into the spotlight as the lone guy who could have stopped the need for all this preparation? Trump was pushing Pence publicly as someone who had the authority on January 6 to send back the dual slates of electors to those 5 states and ask them to return only one slate each to Congress. Trump lawyer Jenna Ellis actually said that out loud: this was the Trump legal team plan as to why they went to testify to each legislature. But the question is the same: why is Trump leaving Pence dangling at all, forcing him to defend his decision NOT to do what Trump's legal team asked him to do if Trump already had the devolvement in place? If devolution was years in the making - and your series is all about proving that - then it makes no sense to push Pence out onto the plank as they did. Unless......pushing him out there is exactly what Trump wanted to do: make Pence have to betray MAGA supporters. As far as Trump supporters go, the vast majority of them look at Pence as a traitor having certified the fraud (which is a delicate position for him if he knew the extent of the fraud and certified it anyway). Given Trump has now officially kicked Pence to the curb - publicly stating any Trump return will not include him - maybe it was yet another 5D chess move of Trump getting rid of him the most effective way he could have done. Pence has no future now in politics despite setting up his office for a 2024 POTUS run. GOP voters will look at him as someone who certified a fraudulent election. That would be in keeping with Trump's growing list of masterstrokes.
You seem to lack the capacity of the task it takes to gather evidence and prosecute it. That takes years unfortunately. It's possibly true that there are tribunals at the White House since we know the White House is not occupied and there is a very strange but firm temporary structure in the back yard as per aerial photos of today's White House, which is also fenced now.
After reading this reply to me, I can honestly say I have no idea what you are addressing in my post. I said nothing about trials, tribunals, or anything else. I mentioned Trump proving election fraud to the SCOTUS. He already has the evidence - at least he says he does. SCOTUS is a civil court, not a criminal court. They don't prosecute. The "fence" around the white house is a construction fence surrounding the fountain in front, as Nancy Drew's videos clearly indicate. So honestly, I have no clue what it is you think I don't grasp. My point was whatever is devolved - if it is - pertains only to the Executive branch.
It’s very clear that you lack reading comprehension and this blog is above your pay grade. The reason zero cases have been in front of any courts is because they are corrupt. The Scotus was kicked saying they lack standing which is pure insanity. The cabal is deep. You’re assuming things work like under normal circumstances.
First, genius, you're so stunningly wrong about "zero cases having been in front of any court" that it speaks loudly to who it is between us that has the far lower pay grade. A total of 87 cases made their way into the court system dealing with the fraud of the 2020 election. Of those 87, Trump & the GOP won 71% of those.
https://republicbroadcasting.org/news/updated-list-of-2020-election-fraud-cases-shows-87-total-cases-trump-gop-won-71-of-cases/
So before you go around insulting people about what they do and don't know, get your own cluelessness shored up first. It took me all of 10 seconds to find this link to prove you don't know what you're talking about. So sit down. Stay quiet. And let those of us who have a clue hash this out. If your opinion is asked for, someone will call on you. But I wouldn't hold my breath if I were you, given you demonstrate no grasp of anything that's , you know, factual.
Great! Where's the decertification due to the 87 cases? And if you knew this, then why are you asking stupid questions. You are so dim you couldn't comprehend what I was saying, only what you wish to scream. So sit this one out Nicky.
LOL! You were the one who was flat out wrong, and you don't even have the integrity to admit it. Now you wanna demand where this mysterious "decertification" is, based on court cases you were adamant never existed. You're proven wrong about "0" cases, and to avoid being called out as the know-nothing you are, you just move on to the next complaint: where is "decertification"?? Tell you what, outline the statutes in each state that show all of us in detail what this "decertification" process is, legislatively. Show us what statutes exist now for all these legislatures to produce this "decertification" you demand - Screaming High-Chair Queen that you are. Go ahead...we'll wait. In the meantime..
Given all you do is ankle-bite bitching via a varying laundry list of complaints that had nothing to do with anything I wrote about, you outed yourself: one of those buffoons who thinks their thimble-sized intellect constitutes "expertise". Like I said: sit down, shut up, and let those who actually know things sort this out. It's painfully obvious this is already way out of your league.
https://substack.com/profile/44202159-smm/note/c-56857300?utm_source=notes-share-action&r=qbelr
Jon, Could you please let me know if you received my comment just below?
Dear Jon,
I just was listening to your rumble channel from Friday, i believe, with Patrick and Chris Paul.
Devolution Power Hour #250, and I am at 1:39:30 and you 3 are talking about spreading word to get your channel out there organically... I WILL WHOLEHEARTEDLY SPREAD THE WORD, BUT YOU M U S T UNMUTE ME FROM COMMENTING! I've tried every way possible to be unmuted, but to no avail. It has been probably a year, so I quit listening because it is NOT FUN nor EDUCATIONAL (and it makes me feel like I'm unwanted, even though I am a yearly subscriber to to Substack)
My handle is Susannahmca Susannahmca PLEASE get me out of prison! Thank you, Susannah from Texas
I don't know if this will get through to anyone but why is Susie Wiles, Trump's top 2024 campaign advisor a co-chair at Mercury LLC, owned by Omnicom Group, a supporter of the WEF and a MSM promoter? What is going on? Is she a fox in the hen-house? Look it up for yourselves!
I don't know if this will get through to anyone but why is Susie Wiles, Trump's top 2024 campaign advisor a co-chair at Mercury LLC, owned by Omnicom Group, a supporter of the WEF and a MSM promoter? What is going on? Is she a fox in the hen-house? Look it up for yourselves!
I am going to see if my comment goes through.
Love your show!!