Any Trump "return" will have to be constitutionally sanctioned. He can't just waltz back into the White House without that, for a critical reason: legitimacy. Trump made his farewell speech in the early morning of January 20th, saying he was "leaving" and that he would "be back very soon". This plants the seed in the mind of the nation that what we normally see on inauguration day was status quo this time too: Trump "left", Byeden "fauxnaugurated". Trump openly refers to the "byeden administration", as does all media, and has since 1/20/21. This gives the nation the air that byeden is currently "president". So any Trump restoration prior to a 2024 November election will have to follow strict adherence to what is constitutionally permitted. That substantially limits acceptable scenarios. And it would almost have to include SCOTUS rendering a decision in regard to it. Which means Trump is going to have to engage in a court case to prove the massive fraud he's been talking about non-stop since early 2020. He has to follow a constitutional path back to the presidency, otherwise he'll be seen as illegitimate. He cannot ignore or overthrow the constitution he'll have to swear to uphold. Moreover, a return is highly unlikely to happen this year for one main reason: the Pelosi-led House will impeach him (again), only this time McConnell and all his RINO Trump haters in the Senate will convict him. They - the Senate McConnell gang - want no part of any Trump presidency again. So until or unless the congressional makeup changes, he's not heading back any time soon.
Whatever your theory is of any devolvement, we need to understand it only applies to the Executive branch. No president has any authority to dissolve or liquidate the separate-but-equal co-branches of government. The National Emergency Act itself states plainly that no constitutional suspension - which is the very definition of Martial Law - can be implemented without congress approving. A congress can revoke its own power voluntarily; no president can usurp that from them. That said, we know the military is limited in what it can do in the individual states. But. Rather than think of any devolvement in terms of branch or department, it might have more to do with geography. Washington DC - being a district - can very well fall under military control. Which might explain why the Democrats were so desperate in the early days of the byeden residency to convert DC into a state. The stolen election by foreign enemy nations of the US means DC is/was essentially under foreign occupation. I'll not soon forget that military guy Stephanopulous interviewed just before 1/20 asking if he was going to assure a peaceful transfer of power, and his response was "Yes, we will be ensuring a peaceful transition to MILITARY power". Which would explain all the checkpoints that went up around DC on that day. People coming and going were having to prove their business in the city. The federal buildings are still - to this day - largely vacant, even with all C19 restrictions gone. Byeden is on a set replica of the WH almost always. It's not far-fetched to think that the military seemingly has control of DC because it's essentially fallen to China, Iran, et.al., by stealing the election. Carl Deacon's theory on this from a year ago makes the most sense.
One option for a Trump return is determining whether or not byeden and/or harris were actively involved in either knowing or orchestrating the steal. If that shows up, then any federal court can - and must - order a new election to be held. That might explain why Trump is increasing the frequency of his rallies and interviews. Trump's lawyer who filed the RICO suit warned that another lawsuit will be coming "shortly". Maybe about the fraud?
The election fraud is slowly moving through the state legislators. Eventually enough states will decertify so that joe falls below 270. At that point the SCOTUS may step in to say that stats can decertify when it falls back to the house under the Constitution. House elects Trump and he is legally the President. This happens after the mid-terms so the new much more conservative congress is in place. The crooked deep staters who have been using Ukraine and other foreign countries as a piggy bank will be out because they are also involved in human trafficking. EO 13818 has serious implications for those involved in human trafficking so all those involved with Epstein and pedo island will be held to task. All perfectly Constitutional.
Any Trump "return" will have to be constitutionally sanctioned. He can't just waltz back into the White House without that, for a critical reason: legitimacy. Trump made his farewell speech in the early morning of January 20th, saying he was "leaving" and that he would "be back very soon". This plants the seed in the mind of the nation that what we normally see on inauguration day was status quo this time too: Trump "left", Byeden "fauxnaugurated". Trump openly refers to the "byeden administration", as does all media, and has since 1/20/21. This gives the nation the air that byeden is currently "president". So any Trump restoration prior to a 2024 November election will have to follow strict adherence to what is constitutionally permitted. That substantially limits acceptable scenarios. And it would almost have to include SCOTUS rendering a decision in regard to it. Which means Trump is going to have to engage in a court case to prove the massive fraud he's been talking about non-stop since early 2020. He has to follow a constitutional path back to the presidency, otherwise he'll be seen as illegitimate. He cannot ignore or overthrow the constitution he'll have to swear to uphold. Moreover, a return is highly unlikely to happen this year for one main reason: the Pelosi-led House will impeach him (again), only this time McConnell and all his RINO Trump haters in the Senate will convict him. They - the Senate McConnell gang - want no part of any Trump presidency again. So until or unless the congressional makeup changes, he's not heading back any time soon.
Whatever your theory is of any devolvement, we need to understand it only applies to the Executive branch. No president has any authority to dissolve or liquidate the separate-but-equal co-branches of government. The National Emergency Act itself states plainly that no constitutional suspension - which is the very definition of Martial Law - can be implemented without congress approving. A congress can revoke its own power voluntarily; no president can usurp that from them. That said, we know the military is limited in what it can do in the individual states. But. Rather than think of any devolvement in terms of branch or department, it might have more to do with geography. Washington DC - being a district - can very well fall under military control. Which might explain why the Democrats were so desperate in the early days of the byeden residency to convert DC into a state. The stolen election by foreign enemy nations of the US means DC is/was essentially under foreign occupation. I'll not soon forget that military guy Stephanopulous interviewed just before 1/20 asking if he was going to assure a peaceful transfer of power, and his response was "Yes, we will be ensuring a peaceful transition to MILITARY power". Which would explain all the checkpoints that went up around DC on that day. People coming and going were having to prove their business in the city. The federal buildings are still - to this day - largely vacant, even with all C19 restrictions gone. Byeden is on a set replica of the WH almost always. It's not far-fetched to think that the military seemingly has control of DC because it's essentially fallen to China, Iran, et.al., by stealing the election. Carl Deacon's theory on this from a year ago makes the most sense.
One option for a Trump return is determining whether or not byeden and/or harris were actively involved in either knowing or orchestrating the steal. If that shows up, then any federal court can - and must - order a new election to be held. That might explain why Trump is increasing the frequency of his rallies and interviews. Trump's lawyer who filed the RICO suit warned that another lawsuit will be coming "shortly". Maybe about the fraud?
Trump goes by the Constitution, this time will be no different!! 🙏🇺🇸♥️🥰😎
Another WOW. Thank you.
The election fraud is slowly moving through the state legislators. Eventually enough states will decertify so that joe falls below 270. At that point the SCOTUS may step in to say that stats can decertify when it falls back to the house under the Constitution. House elects Trump and he is legally the President. This happens after the mid-terms so the new much more conservative congress is in place. The crooked deep staters who have been using Ukraine and other foreign countries as a piggy bank will be out because they are also involved in human trafficking. EO 13818 has serious implications for those involved in human trafficking so all those involved with Epstein and pedo island will be held to task. All perfectly Constitutional.